Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Friday, May 3, 2024
HomeNewsPoliticsAudit: 2020 Presidential Candidates Have Scores of Fake Twitter Followers

Audit: 2020 Presidential Candidates Have Scores of Fake Twitter Followers

Trump, Sanders Score the Highest, Harris’ Audit Indicated Deception

2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates Twitter Audits Graphic.
2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates Twitter Audits Graphic.

With the exception of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, audits conducted on the official Twitter accounts belonging to the top 2020 presidential candidates revealed scores of fake followers.

Moreover, a comparison of audits conducted prior and subsequent to one candidate’s announcement indicated deception.

How Audits Were Conducted

Each audit was conducted using the well-known online tool Twitter Audit, which draws a sample of up to 5000 or more, unless you subscribe to the Pro Twitter Audit service, which we do.

Followers for a user are scored based on the number of tweets, the date of the last tweet, and the ratio of followers to friends. Those scores determine whether any given user is real or fake.

“Of course, this scoring method is not perfect,” Twitter Audit states openly on the site, “but it is a good way to tell if someone with lots of followers is likely to have increased their follower count by inorganic, fraudulent, or dishonest means.”

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders

As previously stated, audits of the official Twitter accounts belonging to Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders, D-I-Vt., indicate real support and interest.

Bernie Sanders Twitter Audit

While the number of fake followers is significant, it is somewhat expected for a former presidential candidate and target of the status quo.

Similarly, President Donald Trump has roughly the same percentage of fake followers as Senator Sanders, though it is pretty clear both are high risk accounts given their controversial positions.

Donald Trump Twitter Audit Results

More than Half of Cory Booker’s Followers Are Fake

While there is no updated audit score available for Senator Cory Booker, D-N.J., we do have audit results dated to the height of the confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Corey Booker Twitter Audit Results

More than half, or nearly 2.5 million, of the user accounts following Senator Booker, are fake. Less than 1.7 million were deemed real.

Senator Booker currently has 4.18 million followers on Twitter, roughly the same as when the audit was conducted.

We found similar results for the account belonging to Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., though her new 2020 presidential campaign account does not yet have the track record to audit.

More than Half of Elizabeth Warren’s Followers Are Fake

Reflecting the same period as Senator Booker, the audit found more than half of Senator Warren’s followers were also fake.

Elizabeth Warren Twitter Audit Results

In raw numbers, nearly 2.2 million are fake juxtaposed to 1.9 million real users. Also like Senator Booker, their accounts have not updated since their announcements.

But one has updated, and the audit indicated clear deception.

Kamala Harris’ Audit Indicates Deception

As stated above, a comparison of audits conducted prior and subsequent to Kamala Harris’ announcement indicates likely deception.

Below are the results of the audit conducted prior to the announcement, also during the height of the confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Kamala Harris Twitter Audit Results

Senator Harris’ sample indicated nearly 740,000 of her less-than 2 million followers on Twitter were deemed fake. Her audit score came in at 60%, a generous rating considering.

It’s worth noting she was called out on Twitter by Jack Posobiec, an anchor for One America News Network (OANN) on January 29. Perhaps that explains the new available data, but it’s unclear.

Below we can see the results of the audit conducted after Senator Harris announced she is running for president, which received significant journalist fanfare and coverage.

Kamala Harris Twitter Audit Results Post Announcement

The audit, which reflects results from just 5 days ago, found a significant improvement in her score, up to 94%. That was driven largely from the number of fake followers falling by roughly 600,000.

Why Does This Indicate Deception?

There are two main ways for a user to reduce the number of fake followers on their Twitter account. First, the fake follower themselves unfollows the user, or the followed account blocks them.

Either way, as the organic follower count increased, Senator Harris’ account began bleeding fake followers, reducing the number significantly and increasing the audit score to 94%.

But at 2.36 million, Senator Harris has not gained in followers since the announcement. She simply gained organic followers and swapped out the fake followers, leaving her overall count roughly flat.

Former Vice President Joe Biden Fares Slightly Better

Joe Biden Twitter Audit Results

More than a quarter of those following former vice president Joe Biden, are fake. His Twitter Audit scored him at 73%, with roughly 760,000 fake followers and just over 2 million real followers.

That certainly tops some of the aforementioned candidates, but not Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.


In the interest of transparency, an audit of my own Twitter account came in at 98%, though I and most other users are not the bot targets you’d expect politicians’ profiles to be.

Peoples Pundit Rich Baris Twitter Audit Results

Written by

Rich, the People's Pundit, is the Data Journalism Editor at PPD and Director of the PPD Election Projection Model. He is also the Director of Big Data Poll, and author of "Our Virtuous Republic: The Forgotten Clause in the American Social Contract."

No comments

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial