Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Follow Us:
People's Pundit Locals Community
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
HomeNewsEconomyPhiladelphia Fed: Manufacturing In Mid-Atlantic Region Well Below Expectations

Philadelphia Fed: Manufacturing In Mid-Atlantic Region Well Below Expectations

(Photo: Reuters)

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s gauge of manufacturing activity in the mid-Atlantic region dropped to 5.2 in February from 6.3 the month prior. The Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey widely missed Wall Street expectations of a rise to 9.3.

The current activity index fell for the third consecutive month, as did the future activity index and the diffusion index for current general activity.

The current new orders index fell 3 points, but the shipments and unfilled orders indexes turned positive and rose 15 and 16 points, respectively. The diffusion index for current general activity fell slightly, from a reading of 6.3 in January to 5.2 this month, with half of respondents indicating no change from the previous month.

The index for delivery times increased 6 points but remained negative, while the index for inventories rose 16 points.

The survey’s indicators for current labor market conditions actually showed a slight improvement this month, adding 6 points and returning to positive territory. The percentage of firms reporting increases in employment — at 21 percent — beat out the percentage reporting decreases, at 17 percent. However, the workweek index was negative with almost no change from last month, indicating wage growth stubbornly remains non-existent.

Most firms (55 percent) reported an increase in underlying demand, while 20 percent reported a decrease. Fifty-four percent of the firms anticipate increasing production, and 33 percent expect to cut production. The diffusion index for general future activity fell from a reading of 50.9 in January to 29.7 in February.

Special Questions (February 2015)

1. Since the beginning of the year, how would you characterize the underlying demand for your manufactured products? Exclude any purely seasonal effect.
Increase significantly
6.7%
Increase modestly
48.3%
  Total increase
55.0%
No change
25.0%
Decrease modestly
18.3%
Decrease significantly
1.7%
  Total decrease
20.0%
2. What change, if any, do you anticipate in your firm’s production during the first quarter of 2015 compared with the fourth quarter of last year?
Increase of more than 4%
19.7%
Increase of 2-4%
23.0%
Increase of less than 2%
11.4%
  Total increase
54.1%
No change
13.1%
Decrease of less than 2%
9.8%
Decrease of 2-4%
9.9%
Decrease of more than 4%
13.1%
  Total decrease
32.8%
Average expected growth for all firms: 0.69%
Average expected growth for firms attributing growth to seasonal factors: – 0.96%*
Average expected growth for firms attributing growth to changes in conditions: 2.41%*
*The calculation is based on responses to a separate question about whether the expected change was due to seasonal factors, change in business conditions, or other factors.
3. Would this represent an acceleration or deceleration from the fourth quarter?
Significant acceleration 8.2%
Acceleration:
49.2%
Some acceleration 41.0%
No change 19.7%
Some deceleration 23.0%
Deceleration:
31.1%
Significant deceleration 8.1%
Written by
Staff Writing Group

PPD Business, the economy-reporting arm of People's Pundit Daily, is "making sense of current events." We are a no-holds barred, news reporting pundit of, by, and for the people.

No comments

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial