Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Follow Us:
Saturday, July 4, 2020
HomeOpinionBernie’s Problem With Blacks — and Others

Bernie’s Problem With Blacks — and Others


Bernie observes the moment of silence to mourn death of Michael Brown. (Photo: Rich Smith via Twitter)

So Barack Obama is “a Rockefeller Republican in blackface.” He’s “a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs” and “a black puppet of corporate plutocrats.” Those are the words of Cornel West, an African-American academic whom Bernie Sanders invites to campaign beside him.

And Sanders’ fans wonder why Bernie isn’t catching on with black and Latino voters. They argue people of color just need to know their hero’s “positions.” They’d learn that if Sanders were to win the Democratic nod and be elected president, he would do more for them than any other candidate out there.

Wait one second.

Everyone is entitled to criticize Obama’s policies, but beating him up in racial terms is crude and unfair. Being black himself does not excuse West from the racial extortion he practices. (By the way, why can’t an African-American be a Rockefeller Republican if he so chooses?)

Not only hasn’t Sanders condemned these remarks but also his campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, defends them. Weaver says of West: “He’s a forceful voice for understanding the intersection of racial justice and economic justice. He understands very well Bernie’s message.”

Boy, are these guys tone-deaf.

That’s the problem with movement politics, no matter what end of the political spectrum they occupy. Movement politics tend to be narcissistic and dictatorial. They allow dissent only within a narrow philosophical band. That constrains the ability to hear through others’ ears.

Mother Jones magazine related the story of how Sanders swatted down a fellow Vermont activist for posing an innocent but off-script question. It was during Sanders’ 1972 run for Vermont governor that Greg Guma asked Bernie why he should vote for him. Guma recalled Sanders responding: “If you didn’t come to work for the movement, you came for the wrong reasons. I don’t care who you are; I don’t need you.”

Sanders has much mellowed since then, but he still inhabits a self-righteous cocoon that has made him an ineffective and marginal figure in the Senate.

Even Democrats express frustration at working with Sanders, an independent who caucuses with them. Moderates bristle at his moralizing and refusal to make compromises required to pass needed legislation. The undeniably liberal Barney Frank, former rep from Massachusetts, complained of Sanders’ “holier-than-thou attitude.”

Bernie’s positions on civil rights have been close to impeccable, but his history with nonwhites is more complicated.

Back in 1960s New York, black radicals weren’t keen to sit at the knees of white intellectuals and be told what’s what. The ensuing tensions prompted many white radicals to flee to the more accommodating hills of Vermont. Sanders was one. There’s no gentler way to put this, but they were part of the era’s white flight.

I’m not crazy about the term “white privilege,” but there is something to the notion that middle-class whites get a pass on the sort of “bad choices” that ruin black lives.

Jeb Bush consumed prodigious amounts of pot in his dorm room at the elite Phillips Academy with no legal consequences. Had a poor black teen been caught doing the same thing on his front steps, he might very well have gone to prison. He couldn’t have served in the Army, much less as commander in chief.

Sanders has a son born out of wedlock. In 2015, that is not a disqualifier — certainly not if you’re a white male. If you’re black (or female), I couldn’t imagine such a detail going so little noticed.

I know that Bernie people are going to howl at me for this unflattering portrait. I ask them how they’d react to Donald Trump’s defending race-studded attacks against our admirable president.

They may insist that to know Bernie is to love him. Well, love can be blind — and deaf.

Written by

Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at [email protected]

Latest comments

  • Avatar

    His apparent self righteousness is matched only by the author’s lack of originality. We’ve seen the stuff about West before, as well as the other quotes. Frankly, if I was Sanders, I would want to disassociate myself from Obama, too, just as Clinton has been doing. I think a lot of blacks were disappointed with Obama for a wide variety of reasons. He certainly turned out to be a dud, even if he had a lot of help from Republicans. The “fire” that Omama lacked, Sanders has. Blow complained about this association the other day, as well, so it seems to be thematic for the press at this point in the criticism of Sanders as to why his outreach to blacks is not netting any results at this point. Perhaps, he will never be liked by blacks. Does anyone know what blacks actually want and whether or not those things might actually be attainable? What they pursue on a Federal level only seems possible on a state and local level, so I would think that the Presidential election will be of little consequence to blacks no matter what Democrat wins the nomination. If a Republican wins, that’s another story, but blacks did not seem very motivated to turn out for the midterms in 2010 and 2014, and as a country, we will continue to pay for that for a very long time as another missed opportunity. When your read this article, the impression given is that there is nothing good about Sanders and that somehow he is anti-black. That is just plain wrong, and the false arguments about “white privilege” is a middle class guilt trip and an avoidance of reality. What Mr. Bush may have done in his dorm room, whether it is right or wrong, he could afford to do. What the author misses and people react to is that drugs supported by crime is different and a real menace to society. The bottom line is that no one is going to bring jobs to the populations immured in the places that seem dominated by blacks and that these places will continue to languish after this election and the next and the one after that. Until people start advancing some ideas that could work and are acceptable to those bearing the brunt of the problem, nothing will happen. However, if there is anyone who has the will to try, I would think that it is clearly Mr. Sanders, hands down, to coin a phrase.

  • Avatar

    What was the point of this article?

    Here’s my summary:

    “Cornel West was mean to Obama! Bernie Sanders said something mean to someone 43 years ago! Movement politics is mean! Because I said so! So vote for whatever candidate the establishment and corporate media serves up!”

    Not a single mention of the issues the West and Obama differ on. Not a single mention of any of the issue stances or ideas that have fueled Sanders’ growing popularity. Not a trace of substance to be found. Nothing but a strained, speculative, petty personality critique. What a perfect representation of how corporate media cover “politics” in 2015. Get a job working for TMZ.

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial