Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Follow Us:
Friday, May 22, 2020
HomeNewsPoliticsLerner’s Blackberry Destroyed After Congress Began Investigation, IRS Admits

Lerner’s Blackberry Destroyed After Congress Began Investigation, IRS Admits

lois lerner
lois lerner

Lois Lerner, former head of the IRS unit that decides whether to grant tax-exempt status to groups, listens on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 22, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Lois Lerner’s Blackberry was intentionally destroyed after Congress had begun investigating the IRS targeting of conservative groups, a senior IRS lawyer acknowledged in a sworn declaration.

In compliance with a ruling by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, Thomas Kane, the Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel for the IRS, wrote in the declaration, that the Blackberry was “removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012.”

In June 2012, ex-IRS official Lerner, the former head of the agencies 501(c)-4 division, had already been ordered to appear before congressional investigators who interviewed her about the illegal targeting of conservative groups.

“We had already talked to her. Our personal staff and Oversight Committee staff had sat down with Ms. Lerner and confronted her about information we were getting from conservative groups in the state of Ohio and around the country,” Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox News.

The IRS has not yet responded to a request for a comment addressing the latest development, but the revelation of the Blackberry’s destruction followed a bombshell Monday by government watchdog group, Judicial Watch. The group stated that Justice Department attorneys admitted the previously “lost” Lerner emails were, in fact, not lost at all. Justice confirmed in a Friday phone call the federal government backs up all computer records to ensure continuity of government in event of a catastrophe. However, they said retrieving the Lerner emails would simply be “too onerous.”

“The Obama administration attorneys said that this back-up system would be too onerous to search,” Fitton said. “We obviously disagree that disclosing the emails as required would be onerous, and plan to raise this new development with Judge Sullivan.”

The Obama administration immediately pushed back on the group’s claim, stating that they simply misinterpreted the Justice Department’s intention.

“There was no new back-up system described last week to Judicial Watch,” an administration official told Fox News Monday night. “Government lawyers who spoke to Judicial Watch simply referred to the same email retention policy that Commissioner (John) Koskinen had described in his Congressional testimony.”

But Cleta Mitchell, an attorney who represents other conservative groups suing the IRS, cited a whistleblower who bolsters Judicial Watch’s interpretation.

“I received information from a former Department of Homeland Security official who had security clearances. He just retired in April,” Mitchell said. “He contacted me and he contacted Judicial Watch and some members of Congress and said there is backup material.”

By all accounts, it is likely that the same judge who played a pivotal role in reversing the conviction of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens will not take kindly to the government’s flip-flop and conduct if it turns out they are lying. Judge Sullivan took the unprecedented step when he appointed Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola to facilitate the recovery of the documents and discussions between the IRS and Judicial Watch. He further authorized the group to submit a request when needed for limited discovery into the missing IRS records after the September 10 date, which following the latest outrage, the group is certain to do.

“He gave the IRS not one, but two opportunities in court filings with him to tell him where they were,” Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch said. “There was no mention of this backup system to the court at that time.”

Meanwhile, Jay Sekulow, the Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, the firm representing numerous groups who were unfairly targeted by the IRS, says the destruction of the Blackberry is just the latest crime committed.

“If you intentionally destroy evidence, that is a crime. If you make a statement in court saying the evidence is not available and it is, that is also a crime.”

Written by
Editor

Laura Lee Baris is the Assistant Editor at People's Pundit Daily (PPD) and the Producer of "Inside the Numbers" with the People's Pundit. Laura covers politics, entertainment, culture and women's issues. She is also married to the People's Pundit, Richard D. Baris, and a mother to their two beautiful children.

Latest comments

  • Avatar

    Half-right.

    “If you intentionally destroy evidence, that is a crime. If you make a statement in court saying the evidence is not available and it is, that is also a crime.”

    If you intentionally destroy evidence….. yes, you have a crime.

    If you make a statement in court saying the evidence is not available and it is, it would have to be further proven that you KNEW the evidence is available. Only then would it be a crime.

  • Avatar

    What the heck does Justice Stevens have to do with this? It’s a routine FOIA suit in the trial level court at this moment.

    BTW, the Congressional investigations began in late May 2013; Lerner became the focus and was subpoenaed to testify in June 2013. The obsolete Blackberry was wiped clean as standard procedure in June 2012. Now, I didn’t go beyond college calculus, mind you, but I understand enough math to see that the timeline is a wee bit off.

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial