Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Follow Us:
People's Pundit Locals Community
Thursday, August 18, 2022
HomePolicyIRS Chief On Obamacare: What’s Good For Thee Is Not Good For Me

IRS Chief On Obamacare: What’s Good For Thee Is Not Good For Me

The head of the IRS Danny Werfel, who is tasked with enforcing ObamaCare said Thursday to Congress that he’d rather not get his own health insurance from the system created by the health care overhaul.

“I would prefer to stay with the current policy that I’m pleased with rather than go through a change if I don’t need to go through that change,” said acting IRS chief Danny Werfel, during a House Ways and Means Committee hearing.

The statement underscores the progressive philosophy of “what’s good for thee is not good for me,” and hopefully will fuel more calls to block the IRS from enforcing the legislation.

“Count the head of the IRS among the growing list of folks that includes Big Labor and the law’s chief architect who are deeply skeptical of the president’s signature achievement and don’t want any part of it,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said in a statement. “No American — even the head of the IRS — should be subjected to ObamaCare.”

Werfel, in his testimony, was supposedly attempting to address concerns from IRS employees and other federal workers who do not want to be forced into the so-called insurance “exchanges” — regulated marketplaces where insurance, much of it subsidized, will be sold as early as next year. Well, get in line Werfel, because neither does the rest of the country.

Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., has been pushing a bill that would force federal workers into the exchanges, and out of their federal health care plans.  However, the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents IRS workers, recently came out against that bill and urged members to oppose it.

When asked about the NTEU position, Werfel said he could offer his “perspective” as a federal employee. He said the Affordable Care Act, even though it was sold otherwise, was designed to “provide an option or an alternative” for individuals who do not have affordable coverage. No one ever believed for a minute that the law was designed to hook people in need, but screw people who weren’t.

“And all else being equal, I think if you’re an individual who is satisfied with your health care coverage, you’re probably in a better position to stick with that coverage than go through the change of moving into a different environment and going through that process,” Werfel said.

Other employees in the private sector, however, might not get that choice — amid concerns that the costs and regulations associated with the law could compel some employers to drop coverage for workers and/or reduce staffing levels to contain costs, sending more workers into the ObamaCare exchanges.

Some Republicans in Congress are trying to ramp up efforts to stall the law, and some are doing what they do best – cave in. The House – included dozens of Democrats who joined with the Republican majority – voted last month to delay the law’s key insurance mandates, while Republicans in the Senate have launched a separate effort to try to defund the law in the next fiscal year’s budget. A number of Republicans, unfortunately, are not on board with that effort, saying it does not have the votes to succeed. In other words, I would rather just worry about my own career than the American people.

Cornyn, in response to Werfel’s testimony, urged the acting IRS chief to back his legislation to block the IRS from enforcing the health care law.

Written by
Data Journalism Editor

Rich, the People's Pundit, is the Data Journalism Editor at PPD and Director of the PPD Election Projection Model. He is also the Director of Big Data Poll, and author of "Our Virtuous Republic: The Forgotten Clause in the American Social Contract."

No comments

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial