Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Connect With PPD
Thursday, September 19, 2019
HomeNewsPoliticsSupreme Court Rules 7-2 World War I Memorial Peace Cross Stays

Supreme Court Rules 7-2 World War I Memorial Peace Cross Stays

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), left, and the Bladensburg World War I Memorial, more commonly referred to as the Peace Cross. (Photo: AdobeStock/Ben Jacobson via WikiCommons)

High Court Reversed, Remanded Fourth Circuit in Fractured Decision

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), left, and the Bladensburg World War I Memorial, more commonly referred to as the Peace Cross. (Photo: AdobeStock/Ben Jacobson via WikiCommons)
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), left, and the Bladensburg World War I Memorial, more commonly referred to as the Peace Cross. (Photo: AdobeStock/Ben Jacobson via WikiCommons)

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to reverse and remand a lower court’s decision to remove the Bladensburg World War I Memorial, more commonly referred to as the Peace Cross.

The cross was erected in what is now a traffic circle to commemorate the fallen soldiers who served in World War I. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, agreed with the American Humanist Association that the war memorial was unconstitutional.

But ruling on American Legion v. American Humanist Association, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded, meaning the cross can stay.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the fractured opinion for the majority.

The High Court ruled the Peace Cross “has become a prominent community landmark, and its removal or radical alteration at this date would be seen by many not as a neutral act but as the manifestation of a hostility toward religion that has no place in our Establishment Clause traditions.”

And contrary to respondents’ intimations, there is no evidence of discriminatory intent in the selection of the design of the memorial or the decision of a Maryland commission to maintain it. The Religion Clause of the Constitution aim to foster a society in which people of all beliefs can live together harmoniously, and the presence of the Bladensburg Cross on the land where it has stood for so many years is fully consistent with that aim.”

Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, an appointee of President Donald Trump, further wrote that there should be no standing to sue for people who are offended by the presence of religious symbols. Justice Clarence Thomas joined Justice Gorsuch.

Written by
Staff Writing Group

People's Pundit Daily delivers reader-funded data journalism covering the latest news in politics, polls, elections, business, the economy and markets.

Latest comment

  • Avatar

    It would have been useful to include the names of those who voted against the decision.

leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.